Skip to content
Get a Demo
Contact Us

 

Reduce preventable review work with MLR pre-check

Content Preflight is Vodori’s AI-powered MLR pre-check that identifies quality and governance issues before formal review begins.

Schedule a Demo
Vodori_Benchmarks_Data_Infographic (1)

Why do content issues still reach MLR review?

It's a familiar story: after hours of work from marketing, brand, and agencies, you submit materials to MLR—only to get flagged hours later for a typo and a missing registered mark. Review stalls, frustration builds, and the launch slips.

This situation is not uncommon. In fact, according to our 2025 proprietary benchmarks report, two of the most common reasons content is sent back for recirculation are:

  • Typos, errors, and formatting issues

  • Branding inconsistencies

Content Preflight is designed to catch these issues before they reach formal review and improve first pass acceptance rates–all directly within your content review and approval system.

What are the benefits of Content Preflight?

Vodori_ContentPreflight_Features_and_Functionality_H2

Improve the quality of content submitted for review 

  • Analyze a wide variety of doc types, from .docx and PDF to HTML and websites
  • Surface spelling, grammar, formatting, structural, and hyperlink issues before review begins.
  • Ensure brand governance is upheld through correct logo use, content IDs are placed in the appropriate location, and registration marks are used correctly.
  • Reduce preventable quality defects that create downstream rework.
Vodori Content Preflight Features and Functionality

Let your reviewers focus on the things that require human judgement

  • Reduce reviewer time spent identifying mechanical content issues.
  • Help reviewers focus on context, evidence, risk, and scientific judgment.
  • Support review teams without automating decision making.
  • Improve efficiency while maintaining existing governance processes.

Frequently Asked Questions

Isn’t this just spellcheck?

Content Preflight is more than a proofreading tool. It combines quality, branding, formatting, and governance signals specifically designed for regulated content review.

What should be checked before submitting content for MLR review?

Spelling, grammar, formatting issues, brand adherence, hyperlinks–these are just a few of the things that Content Preflight can help catch before you submit content to the review team. The higher quality content is heading into review, the faster it’s able to get reviewed and approved.

I’m currently running my content through AI copilots before MLR review. How is this different?

Content Preflight is designed specifically for regulated content review, while general-purpose AI copilots are designed for broad productivity tasks. Content Preflight flags issues that commonly slow the ad/promo process down and is integrated directly into the promotional review system. General-purpose AI tools can help identify spelling, grammar, or writing issues, but they typically operate outside your content review process and may not be configured to the context of your organization such as correct brand usage, trademark guidance, etc. It’s also worth noting that general AI copilots are unreliable for reviewing HTML content, such as websites.

Is Content Preflight right for all review teams?

Content Preflight is designed for life sciences teams that want to improve content quality before formal MLR review begins, but it is not intended to replace the review process itself. It is best suited for organizations that regularly manage promotional, medical, or regulated content and are looking to reduce preventable rework, improve submission quality, and help reviewers focus on scientific, medical, and regulatory judgment. Content Preflight may be less relevant for organizations that do not operate within regulated review workflows or for teams looking to automate approvals or compliance decisions.

Ready to reduce preventable review work before it reaches MLR?

Book a Demo